Showing posts with label Racist. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Racist. Show all posts

Sunday, May 3, 2015

The Effects of One-Sided Darwinist Education


http://www.harunyahya.com/en/Articles/202596/The-Effects-of-One-Sided-Darwinist-Education


By spreading the lie that there is no purpose to human life, Darwinist education turns people into psychologically sick individuals, pessimistic and psychopathic, devoid of all hope and joy.

One of the examples of this is the Norwegian Anders Behring Breivik. Breivik admitted to perpetrating twin terror attacks in Norway on 22 July, 2011. One of these was a bomb attack on the government building in Oslo in which 8 people died. The other was an attack on a Labor party youth camp on the island of Utøya. Sixty-nine people lost their lives in that attack.

Before the attacks, Breivik set out his views in his ”European Independence Manifesto.” On page 1518, he stated that he regarded himself as a champion of the scientific world view and modern biology. Among the books he “most valued” was Charles Darwin's Origin of Species.1  According to Breivik, "a perfect Europe" must include the laws of social Darwinism.2

On page 1202 of his book, Breivik says that he entirely agrees with  the Darwinist biologist from Princeton University Lee Silver regarding the re-implementation of eugenics. He agrees with Silver’s view that radical policies will have to be applied in the future if the world population is to be reduced to less than half of the current figure, or 3.8 billion.3 On the same page, Breivik makes it clear that he has signed up to Darwin's argument that "genocide and natural selection … go hand in hand ":

“Even if the second and third world countries ignores the call of this ”hegemony” [to stop having babies], nature will correct their suicidal tendencies as they are unable to feed their populations.”4

Breivik goes on to say that there must be no intervention in this natural process, or famine:

“If starvation threatens the countries who have failed to follow our [population capacity] guidelines we should not support them by backing their corrupt leaders or send any form of aid.”5

“Food aid to 3rd world countries must stop immediately as it is the primary cause of overpopulation.”6

These words written by Breivik in person clearly show that he had lost all moral values because of his Darwinist education, as a result of which he cold-bloodedly perpetrated his terrorist  attacks that cost the lives of dozens of people.

Another example of the moral collapse and savagery caused by Darwinist education is the American serial killer Jeffrey Dahmer, who killed and ate 17 children before he was caught. In a last interview with the Dateline NBC channel immediately before he was put to death, Dahmer made the following statement:

“If a person doesn’t think that there is a God to be accountable to, then what’s the point of trying to modify your behavior to keep it within acceptable ranges? That’s how I thought anyway. I always believed the theory of evolution as truth, that we all just came from the slime [by chance]. When we died, you know, that was it, there was nothing.”7

Darwin’s superstition that has poisoned vast numbers, turns people into serial killers and even makes them psychopathic enough to eat human flesh. That is what comes of this false religion that seeks to indoctrinate people with the idea they have no responsibility to a Creator, that convinces them they are purposeless, irresponsible and aimless entities, that regards human beings as animals and that seeks to turn people away from the fact of the hereafter by portraying death as the end.

Darwinism was the worst deception and scourge of the last century, killing, oppression, terror, mass slaughter, degeneration and afflictions of all kinds for the last 200 years. DARWINISM WAS THE WORST DECEPTION AND SCOURGE OF THE LAST CENTURY, and was behind the world wars and the communism and fascism that led to irreligion, racism and mass slaughter in societies at one time.

The unfortunate effects on society of this dark scourge initiated by Darwin have persisted down to the present day. The latest book by Richard Dawkins, one of the most committed devotees of Darwinism today, contains suggestions far removed from belief in God that will inevitably lead to pessimism and despair. One of the most significant instances of this was the way that  Jesse Kilgore, a 22-year-old student in America, committed suicide under the effect of Dawkins’ book he was recommended by a teacher.8

The effect of Dawkins’ terrifying views based on the sinister ideology of Darwinism are by no means limited to that example. In the foreword to his book Unweaving the Rainbow, Dawkins himself admits that fact:

“A foreign publisher of my first book confessed that he could not sleep for three nights after reading it, so troubled was he by what he saw as its cold, bleak message. Others have asked me how I can bear to get up in the mornings. A teacher from a distant country wrote me reproachfully that a pupil had come to him in tears after reading the same book, because it had persuaded her that life was empty and purposeless. He advised her not to show the book to any of her friends, for fear of contaminating them with the same nihilistic pessimism.”9

This sinister scourge, Darwinism, is a perverse religion that inflicts death, murder, despair, lack of feeling, terror and savagery and encourages people to think they are nothing more than animals that came into being by chance. The few remaining representatives of that faith are still striving with all their might to turn people away from belief in God. That is why they strenuously oppose the teaching of the weaknesses of Darwinism in schools, hide away fossils that prove creation, and never admit that protein cannot come into being by chance and that more than 350 million fossils totally refute Darwinism. Yet despite all these measures, people in the 21st century are no longer taken in by lies. All the efforts made to keep Darwinism propped up after it was exposed as a fraud have been in vain.
_______________________

1- http://www.darwinthenandnow.com/2011/07/breivik-a-darwinist/?cb=09394448816310614

2- Anders Behring Breivik, A European Declaration of Independence, p.1386

3- http://www.darwinthenandnow.com/2011/07/breivik-a-darwinist/?cb=09394448816310614

4- Anders Behring Breivik, A European Declaration of Independence, p.1202

5- Anders Behring Breivik, A European Declaration of Independence, p.1202

6- Anders Behring Breivik, A European Declaration of Independence, p.1203

7- Kelly J. Coghlan, Houston Chronicle Sunday-15 February 2009

8- http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=81459

9- Richard Dawkins, Unweaving The Rainbow New York: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1998, p. ix.

Tuesday, July 23, 2013

The events in America are the result of a Darwinist mindset that regards black people as a primitive race

The events in America are the result of a Darwinist mindset that regards black people as a primitive race


Shooting of Trayvon Martin

Trayvon Martin: Protests across US at Zimmerman verdict

George Zimmerman Killed One Boy, 17-year-old Trayvon Martin: There are Six Million Trayvons
Protests have taken place in America after the suspect in the killing of a 17-year-old colored boy was released by the police. Obama has called for calm, recalling that America is a state of law.”
ADNAN OKTAR: Calm is good, but people are loveless. You provide Darwinist, materialist education, Mr. Obama! Darwin’s theory regards black people as a backward race, a primitive race. As something between humans and animals; Darwin explicitly says so. You also educate people in that and tell them of it day and night. Then this is how people end up behaving.
Had that man been white, it would all have been very different. Had it been Obama's child, it would all have been very different, or had it been the child of a U.S. senator, it would all have been very different. Something is wrong here.
A lady of Congolese origin in Italy is compared to an orangutan. Why? That person was speaking in the light of Darwin’s theory. He regards her as half human, half animal.
Yet she is a servant of Allah, descended from the Prophet Adam (pbuh), our sister. Our true blood sister. People fail to realize what they are saying. Darwinism and materialism have produced a loveless and ruthless spirit, they have shattered people’s hearts. This is just what they say; there is much more of it in their hearts, by the law of Allah. ( July 16th, 2013, Adnan Oktar: A9 TV)
2013-07-22 04:55:21 

Tuesday, April 30, 2013

The Baath regime in Syria is definitely a communist regime

The Baath regime in Syria is definitely a communist regime







Ba'athism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ba'athism (from the Arabic البعث Al-Ba'ath or Ba'ath meaning "renaissance" or "resurrection") is an Arab nationalist ideology that promotes the development and creation of an Arab nation through the leadership of avanguard party over a progressive revolutionary state. The ideology is officially based on the theories of Zaki al-Arsuzi (according to the pro-Syrian Ba'ath movement), Michel Aflaq and Salah al-Din al-Bitar.
A Ba'athist society seeks enlightenment, renaissance and rebirth of Arab culture, values and society. It supports the creation of single-party states, and rejects political pluralism in an unspecified length of time – the Ba'ath party theoretically uses an unspecified amount of time to develop an enlightened Arabic society. Ba'athism is based on principles of Arab nationalism, pan-Arabism, Arab socialism, as well as social progress. It is a secular ideology. A Ba'athist state supports socialist economics to a varying degree, and supports public ownership over the heights of the economy but opposes the confiscation of private property. Socialism in Ba'athist ideology does not mean state socialism or economic equality, but modernisation; Ba'athists believe that socialism is the only way to develop an Arab society which is truly free and united.
The two Ba'athist states which have been in existence (Iraq and Syria), through a policy of authoritarianism, forbid opposition and criticism of their ideology. The existing Ba'athist regimes have been labelled as neo-Ba'athist, because the form of Ba'athism developed in these countries was very different than the Ba'athism of Aflaq and al-Bitar; for example, none of the ruling Ba'ath parties actually pursued or pursues a policy of unifying the Arab world.

Allegations of being fascist


Cyprian Blamires claims that "Ba'athism may have been a Middle Eastern variant of fascism, even though 'Aflaq and other Ba'ath leaders criticised particular fascist ideas and practices."[56] According to him, the Ba'ath movement shared several characteristics with the European fascist movement, such as "the attempt to synthesize radical, illiberal nationalism and non-Marxist socialism, a romantic, mythopoetic, and elitist 'revolutionary' vision, the desire both to create a 'new man' and to restore past greatness, a centralised authoritarian party divided into 'right-wing' and 'left-wing' factions and so forth; several close associates later admitted that 'Aflaq had been directly inspired by certain fascist and Nazi theorists."[56] An argument against Aflaq's fascist credentials is that he was an active member of the Syrian–Lebanese Communist Party, he participated in the activities of the French Communist Party during his stay in France,[57] and that he was influenced by some of the ideas of Karl Marx.[27] Cyprian concludes that Ba'athism, along with the Free Officers Movement in Egypt, can be categorised asneofascist.[56]
The Arab Ba'ath Party established by Zaki al-Arsuzi was according to Sami al-Jundi, one of the co-founders of the party, heavily influenced by fascist and Nazi ideals. The party's emblem was the tiger because it would "excite the imagination of the youth, in the tradition of Nazism and Fascism, but taking into consideration that the Arab is in his nature is distant from pagan symbols [like the swastika]".[58] Arsuzi's Ba'ath Party believed in the virtues of the "one leader", and Arsuzi himself believed personally in the racial superiority of the Arabs. The party members read a lot of Nazi literature, such as The Foundations of the Nineteenth Century for instance, became one of the first to plan the translation of Mein Kampf into Arabic and they were actively looking for a copy of The Myth of the Twentieth Century – the only copy in Damascus was, according to Moshe Maʻoz, owned by Aflaq.[58] Despite his pro-fascist views, Arsuzi did not support the Axis Powers, and refused Italy's advances for party-to-party relations.[59] Arsuzi was also influenced by the racial theories of Houston Stewart Chamberlain and Nazism.[60] Arsuzi claimed that historically Islam and the Prophet Muhammad had reinforced the nobility and purity of Arabs, which degenerated in purity because of the adoption of Islam by other people.[60] He had been associated with theLeague of Nationalist Action, a political party strongly influenced by fascism and Nazism with its paramilitary "Ironshirts", that existed in Syria from 1932 to 1939.[61]
Saddam drew inspiration on how to rule Iraq from both Joseph Stalin, a communist, and Adolf Hitler, a Nazi. According to a British journalist who interviewed Barzan al-Tikriti, the head of the Iraqi intelligence services, Saddam had asked Barzan to procure these books not for racist or anti-Semitic purposes, but instead "as an example of the successful organisation of an entire society by the state for the achievement of national goals."[62]

Allegations of being racist
In Ba'athist Iraq, Iran, especially during the Iran–Iraq War, was presented as the age-old enemy of the Arabs. The Iraqi Ba'athists, according to Fred Halliday, brought the ideas of Sati al-Husri to their full, official and racist, culmination. For the Ba'athists their pan-Arab ideology was laced with anti-Iranian racism, it rested on the pursuit of anti-Iranian themes, over the decade and a half after coming to power, Baghdad organised the expulsion of Iraqis of Iranian origin, beginning with 40,000 Fayli Kurds, but totalling up to 200,000 or more, by the early years of the war itself. Such racist policies were reinforced by ideology: in 1981, a year after the start of the Iran–Iraq War, Dar al-Hurriya, the government publishing house,[citation needed] issued Three Whom God Should Not Have Created: Persians, Jews, and Flies by the author, Khairallah Talfah, the foster-father and father-in-law of Saddam Hussein. Halliday says that it was the Ba'athists too who, claiming to be the defenders of 'Arabism' on the eastern frontiers, brought to the fore the chauvinist myth of Iranian migrants and communities in the Gulf.[63]
Three Whom God Should Not Have Created: Persians, Jews, and Flies describes Persians (Iranians) as "animals God created in the shape of humans", Jews as a "mixture of dirt and the leftovers of diverse people",[64] andflies as poor misunderstood creatures "whom we do not understand God's purpose in creating".[65] According to Con Coughlin, "This weak Iraqi attempt at imitating Mein Kampf nevertheless had a bearing on Saddam's future policymaking.[65] Mauritanian Regional Branch of the Iraqi-dominated Ba'ath movement was accused of being racist by the Mauritanian Government and certain political groups.[66]
The Iraqi Regional Branch could approve or disapprove of marriages of party members. In a party document, it was ordered that party branches "to check thoroughly the Arabic origin of not the prospective wife but also her family, and no approval should be given to members who plan to marry [someone] from a non-Arab origin."[67] During the war with Iran, the party began to confront members who were of non-Arab, especially Iranian origins. One memo from the party Secretariat sent directly to Saddam read "the party suffers from the existence of members who are not originally Arabs as this might constitute a danger to the party in the future."[68] The Secretariat recommended not giving party membership to people of Iranian origins. In a written reply to the document, Saddam wrote "1) [I] Agree with the opinion of the Party Secretariat; 2) To be discussed in the [Regional] Command meeting."[68] Many of those who were refused, or whose membership had been revoked, were loyal Ba'athists. For instance, one Ba'athist of Iranian origin had been a member of the party since 1958, been a part of the Ramadan Revolution and had been imprisoned by the authorities in the aftermath of the November 1963 Iraqi coup d'état for the Ba'athist cause. Later, the authorities began to specifically look for people of Iraqi origins, and any contact with Iran or Iranian functioned as a good enough reason to not be given party membership.[68]

Michel Aflaq
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Born1910
DamascusOttoman Syria
Died23 June 1989 (age 78-79)
Paris, France
Political partyArab Ba'ath Movement (1940–1947)
Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party(1947–1966)
Iraq-based Ba'ath Party (1968–1989)
ReligionGreek Orthodox Christianity
Michel Aflaq (Arabic: ميشيل عفلق‎‎, 1910 – 23 June 1989) was a Syrian philosopher, sociologist and Arab nationalist. His ideas played a significant role in the development of Ba'athism and its political movement; he is considered by several Ba'athists to be the principal founder of Ba'athist thought. He published various books during his lifetime, the most notable being The Battle for One Destiny (1958) and The Struggle Against Distorting the Movement of Arab Revolution (1975).
Born into a middle-class family in Damascus, Syria, Aflaq studied at the Sorbonne, where he met his future political companion Salah al-Din al-Bitar. He returned to Syria in 1932, and began his political career incommunist politics. Aflaq became a communist activist, but broke his ties with the communist movement when the Syrian–Lebanese Communist Party supported France's colonial policies. Later in 1940 Aflaq and al-Bitar established the Arab Ihya Movement (later renaming itself the Arab Ba'ath Movement, taking the name from Zaki al-Arsuzi's group by the same name). The movement proved successful, and in 1947 the Arab Ba'ath Movement merged with al-Arsuzi's Arab Ba'ath organisation to establish the Arab Ba'ath Party. Aflaq was elected to the party's executive committee and was elected "'Amid" (meaning the party's leader).
The Arab Ba'ath Party merged with Akram al-Hawrani's Arab Socialist Party to establish the Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party in 1952; Aflaq was elected the party's leader in 1954. During the mid-to-late 1950s the party began developing relations with Gamal Abdel Nasser, the President of Egypt, which eventually led to the establishment of the United Arab Republic (UAR). Nasser forced Aflaq to dissolve the party, which he did, but without consulting with party members. Shortly after the UAR's dissolution, Aflaq was reelected as Secretary General of the National Command of the Ba'ath Party. Following the 8th of March Revolution, Aflaq's position within the party was weakened to such an extent that he was forced to resign as the party's leader in 1965. Aflaq was ousted during the 1966 Syrian coup d'état, which led to a schism within the Ba'ath Party. He escaped toLebanon, but later went to Iraq. In 1968 Aflaq was elected Secretary General of the Iraqi-led Ba'ath Party; during his tenure he held no de facto power. He held the post until his death on 23 June 1989.
Aflaq's theories about society, economics and politics, which are collectively known as Ba'athism, hold that the Arab world needs to be unified into one Arab Nation in order to achieve an advanced state of development. He was critical of both capitalism and communism, and critical of Karl Marx's view of dialectical materialism as the only truth. Ba'athist thought placed much emphasis on liberty and Arab socialism – a socialism with Arab characteristics, which was not part of the international socialist movement as defined by the West. Aflaq believed in the separation of state and religion, and was a strong believer in secularisation, but was againstatheism. Although a Christian, he believed Islam to be proof of "Arab genius". In the aftermath of the 1966 Ba'ath Party split, the Syrian-led Ba'ath Party accused Aflaq of stealing al-Arsuzi's ideas, and called him a "thief". The Iraqi-led Ba'ath Party rejects this, and does not believe that al-Arsuzi contributed to Ba'athist thought.




Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Lack of Love

Highlights from Mr. Adnan Oktar's interview on 4 August 2012
Lack of Love
(Photo credit: franklinchronicles.com)

A9 TV,  August 4th, 2012
For example, America lost in Vietnam due to lack of love. However, if she blended into the public and showed love. But she made the public angry by saying “We will control you with bombs. We will control you with bullets and guns” in an arrogant and pedantic manner. People do not like their pride to be broken. Then they took the side of the communists. Thus abasement and deflation have a very severe negative effect on people. It is a must to approach with love, compassion and humbleness.
Nothing is lost with love. Many things are lost due to lack of love, many things are gained due to love. The purpose of this world and its existence is love. When love is gone, the world is also lost; everything is lost. Allah forbid, only hell is left.
I will give an example to show why Hazrat Mahdi (as)’s duty is important. Now they say, “Bediuzzaman is the greatest guide and savior but he did not mention this because he wanted Imam Shafi (as) to get all the reward for this”. This is a very illogical and irrational form of distorting tongues. So this is a manner of speech that puts people in a gullible position.
Is the skin of a dead animal halal? According to Hanafi, “haram” but according to Hanbali “halal”.
Can we eat snakefish? According to Hanafi, “halal” but according to Hanbali “haram”.
Can we eat horse meat? According to Hanafi, “haram” but according to Hanbali “halal”.
Can we eat mussels? According to Hanafi, “haram” but according to Maliki “halal”.......
Reading Surat al-Fatiha at the second rakat is an “obligation” according to Maliki and “necessary” according to Hanafi.
Saying tasbih during sadjah and prostrating is “sunnah” according to Hanafi and “necessary” meaning “obligatory” according to Hanbali.
Reading surah after Surat al-Fatiha at the first two rakats is “necessary” according to Hanafi” and “lawful” according to Maliqi.
Would taking salam during prayer nullify the ablution? According to Hanafi “yes” but according to Maliki “no”…
There is an endless list like that. I only gave an example. When Hazrat Mahdi (as) comes, he eliminates this dilemma. He tells the straight truth.
Hazrat Mahdi (as) corrects this conflict; and these are such vital conflicts. Because look; one thing is “halal” according to one sect and “haram” according to another. Religion is one. How could one overlook this? It would be haram to overlook this. If you have the knowledge and overlook this, then you would do something haram and a very major sin , because you would change Allah’s command. Allah’s command is one. They may have conflicted with the imams of sects as an obligation because it came to him like that, but there is a conflict in the end. It is haram that the conflict continues. Almighty Allah says that those who tell lies in the name of Allah are cruel people.  So you are lying in the name of Allah. He may not be realizing that; it is an excuse.
When a person is opposed to Mahdism, that person is inside the system of the dajjal (anti-christ). The purpose of the dajjal is to eliminate religion and end Mahdism, stop Mahdism and prevent the return of the Prophet Jesus (pbuh) and the activities of the Prophet Jesus (pbuh).
(In response to a viewer question: “Would a non-Muslim who chooses Islam be a member of any sect or which sect should s/he be subject to? Can s/he choose on his or her own?”)
Since the sect of Hazrat Mahdi (as) is not out in the open now, and since Mahdism did not mend things, of course we will be subject to a sect. For example I am a Hanafi. So we are subject to the sect of Hanafi as a necessity.
(In response to viewer question, “Are the incidents in Syria mentioned in the Qur’an?”)
The incidents in Syria are mentioned in the hadiths in detail, as the portents of the coming of Hazrat Mahdi (as) but with great details. How the mosque in Kufa will be destroyed, from where it will be destroyed; everything is explained right down to the finest detail. 
(In response to viewer question “Why did our Alevi brothers and sisters suffer all the time?”)
Bigots are always arrogant and vain like this. The ulema of the Ahl al-Sunnah are gentle and mild people. However, the bigots who use the Ahl al-Sunnah have the tendency to destroy everyone who disagrees with them. Lack of love causes these people to be like this. When there is love, there is none of these troubles.
(In response to viewer question “Why the Turkish Islamic Union? Is this not racist?”)
Then you would leave them without a head. They always left the Muslim world without a head. When there is a leader around, one needs to hold the leadership tight. We say, “There will be Islamic Union”. Who will be the leader? “It could be Egypt, it could be Pakistan, it could be Iran, it could be Turkey”. The man says to us “Put a name on it”. We say again, “No, it could be Pakistan, it could be Egypt, it could be Turkey”. There is no Islamic Union like this. The leader will appear. The leader, the natural leader has appeared. The Messenger of Allah (saas) told us the natural leader via inspiration. It is Turkey. It is the Turks. He says, “The Mahdi will appear in Istanbul”. Done. He says “He will open his flag first among the Turks”. Mahdi is where the holy relics are. Where are the holy relics? They are all here. Thus we call it the Turkish Islamic Union. The Muslim world will gather around the Turkish people who are the servants of the Muslims world. Otherwise, we are not saying “Turks are superior, we are superior genetically in terms of genes, look at our genetic structure and see our superiority”. There is a superiority of service. In terms of fear of Allah, Turkish people are actually a people that live Islam well. The whole world accepts this. But do they not have something missing? Yes they do. But the leader is the Turkish people. Other than this, we do not claim to be racially superior. We could not have. It would be wrong because Allah says “The only superiority is with fear of Allah”. The Messenger (saas) says “A Persian is not superior to an Arab and an Arab is not superior to a Persian”. Done. So there is no issue of race, but when it comes to leadership one needs to read the name out loud. It should be said clearly.
(In response to viewer question “None of the European Union countries like Turkey. America does not like Turkey also. These both support the Kurds and say that Turkey is right on this case.”)
True. We know that America wants a Kurdistan to be established and the Kurds are separated. But it does not want this for the benefit of the Kurds. Evangelicals believe that a big war needs to take place. They believe that there should be an Armageddon. Therefore, they have a belief that there will be a state there, that Israel will dominate the region completely, a big state that covers the cities in Southeast like Batman, Siirt and Diyarbakir, but there will be a Kurdish state; then communist Kurds will be eliminated and then Israel will come to the region and they will kill the Israeli people, so only one hundred and twenty thousand Jewish people will be left, and the others will be killed. Within this context, they want to misuse my dear Kurdish brothers and sisters. We will not let this. America does not like it because they are Darwinists and materialists. What happens when one is Darwinist and materialist? They say, “Turks are a transitional form”. They say, “They are a transitional form that did not complete its evolution”. They say that Turkish people are “Unevolved animals”. The European Union says the same thing. How could a person love another at first sight? Of course he could not.
2012-09-17 12:19:56 

Happy Birthday 2022-02-02 22:00

  2.2.2022, 22.00 HOURS. LET THEM NOT FORGET THESE NUMBERS. This is a date with a special significance. LET THEM JOT THEM DOWN SOMEWHERE, AN...