Ramadan 2012, The 3rd Day
And hold fast, all together, by the rope which Allah (stretches out for you), and be not divided among yourselves; and remember with gratitude Allah’s favour on you; for you were enemies and He joined your hearts in love, so that by His Grace, you became brothers; and you were on the brink of the pit of Fire, and He saved you from it. In this way Allah make His Signs clear to you: That you may be guided. (Surah Al’Imran, 103)
The 'Compassion Of A Mother' Which Is Observed In The Character Of A Mother Is A Trait Of Good Morality That Muslims Should Display Towards Each Other
A mother has an understanding of intense compassion towards her child who is completely unaware and defenseless in the face of the dangers around. Allah makes this feeling of compassion He bestowed on mothers means for the protection of people from the moment they are born. And that feeling of compassion in humans is a manifestation of Allah's name; All-Merciful, Most-Merciful.
Allah had created this feeling of intense compassion, mothers feel towards their children, also in animals in a similar manner. Science is observing the self-sacrificing acts of animals in protecting their whelps in awe and admiration. Of course Allah had created various lessons and examples for man in such behaviors of animals.
"Motherly compassion" is an important measure and example for the understanding of compassion people should feel for each other. Just like a mother who cannot show interest, concern and compassion to a defenseless child only from time to time and leave him alone "to take care of himself" at other times; just like her giving the priority to her child everywhere at all times; this behavior should be the foundation of an ideal understanding of compassion. The compassion people feel for each other should be just like a mother's unflinching and measureless self-sacrifice for her child; just like her putting her child's comfort, peace and needs above her own. The mercy people feel for each other should be as powerful as a mother's, who no matter how hard the conditions she is in are; even in her most tired, sleepless, weakest, most ill, most intense and busiest times; never compromises from this compassion and diligence.
However such a powerful understanding of compassion is of course a feeling that can only be lived with the "fear of Allah". It is Allah Who, for the protection of children, guides mothers by inspiring this feeling of compassion towards their children in them. Yet in order to sustain this understanding of compassion for a lifetime and to forward this to all humans, this person should fear Allah and act in compliance with the morality of the Qur'an.
People who do not have faith, can only display such a powerful morality of compassion towards people with whom they have a connection of interest; that is towards people who they think will provide an interest for them now or in the future. And they can only sustain this temporarily.
Muslims on the other hand can live compassion and mercy as a part of their personalities all through their lives. They adopt the "motherly compassion" Allah shows us as an example, as a trait of their characters. They adopt a manner towards Muslims around them that is much more protective than the diligence a mother shows to her child. They love and respect their Muslim brothers as their friends, companions and families and they never fail in respect for them. However as they act compassionately; they adopt a meticulous morality just like a mother satisfying all the needs, distress and expectations of her child even before they are voiced. They put others' problems, needs, troubles ahead of their own. They never make concessions from protecting their Muslim brothers even in most difficult times.
However the "motherly compassion" should of course not be perceived as putting that person in the place of a child and assuming a more experienced, wiser, more knowing manner towards that person. This understanding of compassion is a morality that is displayed completely in a humble and modest manner. Sometimes the person to approach with the compassion of a mother might be senior than that person himself. The important part here is to be in a very self-sacrificing and tactful manner in protecting and coddling that person and in satisfying his needs with great precision, without making it felt.
This "motherly compassion" seen in Muslims is a very important indication of the love devout people feel for each other. That is because only a person who loves solely for the approval of Allah without getting in any kind of expectation, can show such a high morality. Consequently, showing this morality continuously -without discriminating any person- towards all Muslims is at the same time an important indication which shows that person is a sincere believer.
In the Qur'an, Allah revealed the following about the understanding of compassion Muslims should show to each other:
Do not direct your eyes longingly to what We have given certain of them to enjoy. Do not feel sad concerning them. And take the believers under your wing. (Surat al-Hijr, 88)
Protein Cannot Form Unless The Cell Exists As An Integral Whole
Darwinists can write as many deceptive books jam packed with formulae, produce as many false fossils as they like, make as many demagogic assaults on the scientific evidence for Creation as they choose or stick posters up full of fantastical illustrations and present these as exhibitions of evolution all over the place, but none of this will ever change the fact of their fundamental defeat. Because the worst nightmare for Darwinists is the very beginning of life. Darwinists HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO PRODUCE A SINGLE EXPLANATION of how just one protein came into being. This is an expression of the despairing situation into which, Dawkins, Futuyma, Tim White and all other Darwinists now find themselves. None of this demagoguery can resolve this great and stupendous rout in the face of a single protein. A SINGLE PROTEIN HAS TOTALLY DEMOLISHED DARWINISM.
One important feature of Darwinist demagoguery is that Darwinists always tended to reduce the question of the origin of life to the very simple, despite all the complexity of life, by portraying everything within it as very simple. That is the reason for such myths as “the cell emerged from muddy water” and “DNA spontaneously began replicating itself.” Darwinists imagined it would be easier to deceive people in this way. But they have now seen that the time for such deception has passed. Not only do people now know that a single protein is far too complex ever to come into being spontaneously, they are also aware that neither a protein, DNA, RNA or any other minute component of the cell WILL SERVE ANY PURPOSE IN THE ABSENCE OF THE CELL AS A WHOLE.
This fact is of great important in terms of the defeat of Darwinism:
- DNA is essential for a single protein to form
- DNA cannot form without protein
- Protein cannot form without DNA
- Protein cannot form in the absence of protein
- Sixty separate proteins are needed for a single protein to form
- Protein cannot form in the absence of any one of these
- Protein cannot form with no ribosome
- Protein cannot form with no RNA
- Protein cannot form without ATP
- Protein cannot form without the mitochondria to manufacture ATP
- Protein cannot form without the cell nucleus
- Protein cannot form without the cytoplasm
- Protein cannot form in the absence of a single organelle in the cell
- And proteins are necessary for all the organelles in the cell to exist and function
- There can be no protein without these organelles.
This is an interconnected system that has to function simultaneously. You cannot have one part without the other. Even if one component exists, it will still not function in the absence of the others.
THE WHOLE CELLIS NECESSARY FOR A PROTEIN TO FORM. IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR A SINGLE PROETIN TO FORM IN THE ABSENCE OF THE WHOLE CELL, with its perfect complex structure we see today, but of which we understand only a very small part.
Even if this protein did form spontaneously (which is in any case impossible), it will still serve no purpose. It will just wander around alone and die.
Therefore, Dawkins’ claim of “a spontaneously replicating molecule” is utterly ludicrous and solely intended to deceive. NO MOLECULE IN THE HUMAN CELL POSSESSES THE ABILITY TO REPLICATE ITSELF SPONTANEOUSLY WITHOUT THE HELP OF ANY OTHER MOLECULE.
The Cambridge University Professor of Philosophy Stephen C. Meyer describes this in his book The Signature in the Cell:
Following the elucidation of the structure and function of DNA during the 1950s and early 1960s, a radically new conception of life began to emerge. Not only did molecular biologits discover that DNA carried information; they soon began to suspect that living organisms must contain systems for processing genetic information. Just as the digital information stored on a disc is useless without a device for reading the disc, so too is the information on DNA useless without the cell’s information-processing system. As Richard Lewontin notes, “No living molecule (i.e., biomolecule) is self-producing. Only whole cells may contain all the necessary machinery for self-reproduction... Not only is DNA incapable of making copies of itself, aided or unaided, but it is incapable of ‘making’ anything else... The proteins of the cell are made from other proteins, and without that protein-forming machinery nothing can be made.”1
These statements once again reveal the inconsistency of these accounts by Dawkins, who has recently converted to the religion of outer space. The Earth is the most ideal environment in all of space for the survival of the living cell. But not even these ideal conditions by themselves make it possible for the cell to be able to form spontaneously. Dawkins has looked for a new explanation in the face of this and now maintains that a molecule capable of replicating spontaneously formed in space and subsequently made its way to Earth. The first insoluble problem here is that no such living molecule can form spontaneously. The second is, as set out above, that no living molecule can replicate spontaneously, not even on Earth. Aware of these insoluble problems, Dawkins eventually had to admit that such a molecule was created by a sublime intelligence.2
1 Stephen C. Meyer, The Signature in the Cell, Harper One, 2009, p. 132-133
2Ben Stein, Expelled “No Intelligence Allowed”, 2008, movie
2Ben Stein, Expelled “No Intelligence Allowed”, 2008, movie
Widespread Slaughter Before The Mahdi Comes
The hadiths reveal that violence and chaos will affect the great majority of people before the Mahdi comes and that much blood will be shed:
Modern communications technology will make everyone aware of this corruption and disasters. Even though there may only be few people present at the scene, the whole world will learn what is happening instantaneously. Radio, television, newspapers, and the Internet will broadcast bloodshed, injustice, and oppression to the whole world.